Improving The Hospital Patient Experience

Senior Solo Capstone Project

Improving The Hospital Patient Experience

Senior Solo Capstone Project

About The Project

The initial aim of this project was to address the response times to hospital patient call lights, which could represent a significant safety concern. This could be attributed to factors such as a lack of clarity in the call light's purpose, misuse of the system, and a high volume of calls. The current patient call light experience involves pressing a button and waiting, which poses challenges when patients have varying needs, from simple requests like water to urgent situations. To enhance both the hospital patient experience and operational efficiency, a redesigned patient call light system was deemed to be necessary. 


However, as I progressed through this project my scope narrowed from redesigning the hospital patient call light to enhancing the overall patient experience. This transition occurred when I encountered the Hillrom Centrella Ecosystem and began uncovering various stakeholder needs. This document serves as a narrative of my journey throughout this project, delving into key insights from hospitals to address patient-nurse interaction within the medical space.



Discovery

Discovery

Exploring The Current Call Light Ecosystem

How does the current call light system work?

Methods

Secondary Research | Structured Stakeholder Interviews


Output

User Flow Creation

To locate existing call light systems and understand how they work I did some desk research into a current system. I also interviewed three nurses, one respirataroy therapist, and one med-surge patient. During the interviews I asked about which system they use or used for patient-nurse interaction (call light) and their overall experience using these devices. I documented two different call light ecosystems: The Responder 5 and The Hilrom Centrella Ecosystems.


When I first began this project, I assumed that the call light systems leveraged by the hospitals were much more simplistic. I assumed that there was one call light button available to a patient, after clicked a white dome light would appear above the patients door signifying the patient needs assistance.

The Responder 5

The Rauland Responder 5 call light system was the leading patient-nurse interaction device prior to the Hilrom Centrella Ecosystem. This was the first system I discovered via stakeholder interviews and is still leveraged by many hospitals within the United States. Below outlines how a patient and nurse interact via this system.

Figure 1 - User Flow leveraging the Responder 5 system.


Figure 1 - User Flow leveraging the Responder 5 system.


When a patient needs assistance, they select one of the four buttons on the Responder 5 remote (figure 2). After selecting this button, a dome light above the patient door illuminates the corresponding color to the patients need. Depending on the need from the patient, a registered nurse or a PCA will respond. This is dependent upon the hospital and their management style. A notification will appear on the nurses Vocera (handheld smart device). After the staff arrive to the patient, the staff disables the call light.





Pros:


  • Multiple need affordances for the patient (ie: pain, toilet, water, etc.)

  • Increases communication from patient to staff.

  • Signified via colored dome light or Vocera notification.



Cons:


  • Suffers from call light abuse, where patients activate call light too frequently for minor rationale

  • Nurses deal with an exhausting number of calls.

  • "Turn off" button for staff is located behind bed. Awkward for staff to deactivate.

  • Button can become "out of reach" for patients if the remote falls.

  • The buttons on the remote were "hard to press" for weak patients.

  • Lack of signifier for patient that the call light has been activated. Accidental activation.


















When a patient needs assistance, they select one of the four buttons on the Responder 5 remote (figure 2). After selecting this button, a dome light above the patient door illuminates the corresponding color to the patients need. Depending on the need from the patient, a registered nurse or a PCA will respond. This is dependent upon the hospital and their management style. A notification will appear on the nurses Vocera (handheld smart device). After the staff arrive to the patient, the staff disables the call light.


Pros:


  • Multiple need affordances for the patient (ie: pain, toilet, water, etc.)

  • Increases communication from patient to staff.

  • Signified via colored dome light or Vocera notification.



Cons:


  • Suffers from call light abuse, where patients activate call light too frequently for minor rationale

  • Nurses deal with an exhausting number of calls.

  • "Turn off" button for staff is located behind bed. Awkward for staff to deactivate.

  • Button can become "out of reach" for patients if the remote falls.

  • The buttons on the remote were "hard to press" for weak patients.

  • Lack of signifier for patient that the call light has been activated. Accidental activation.


















When a patient needs assistance, they select one of the four buttons on the Responder 5 remote (figure 2). After selecting this button, a dome light above the patient door illuminates the corresponding color to the patients need. Depending on the need from the patient, a registered nurse or a PCA will respond. This is dependent upon the hospital and their management style. A notification will appear on the nurses Vocera (handheld smart device). After the staff arrive to the patient, the staff disables the call light.


Pros:


  • Multiple need affordances for the patient (ie: pain, toilet, water, etc.)

  • Increases communication from patient to staff.

  • Signified via colored dome light or Vocera notification.



Cons:


  • Suffers from call light abuse, where patients activate call light too frequently for minor rationale

  • Nurses deal with an exhausting number of calls.

  • "Turn off" button for staff is located behind bed. Awkward for staff to deactivate.

  • Button can become "out of reach" for patients if the remote falls.

  • The buttons on the remote were "hard to press" for weak patients.

  • Lack of signifier for patient that the call light has been activated. Accidental activation.


















Figure 2 - Responder 5 Patient Remote displaying activation affordances.


Hilrom Centrella

While talking to a hospital staff worker, respiratory therapist, they pointed out to me a new call light patient-nurse interaction system they had recently been implemented into their hospital. This system was called Hilrom Centrella. The Centrella system features a wide range of devices that all work together. To my understanding, this is the newest system available for medical facilities.


Below is a user flow as to how the Hilrom Centrella ecosystem works.

Figure 3 - User Flow displaying a patient-nurse interaction leveraging the Hilrom Centrella Ecosystem


While researching the Hilrom Centrella, I noticed a device apart of the ecosystem that attempts to improve the hospital patient experience. This device is called the Experience Pod (figure 4).

Figure 4 - The Experience Pod

Device Affordances


  • Holds and charges patient's device (ie: Smartphone, Tablet, etc.

  • Swivels to view front and back

  • Always in reach of patient

  • Adjusts bed position

  • Activate Call Light

  • TV remote

  • ~$2,000 per device


Optional add on device for ecosystem, not required for ecosytem to work. Without this device patients will use a traditional remote shown on right in figure 4.

Discovery Result

Uncovering these devices informed me of the ecosystem that I am currently designing in. It assisted me in understanding the potential flows that both the patient and hospital staff progress through in order to achieve a call light notification response. This research corrected my pre conceived assumptions about my space.


During the time I researched these devices, I also located pain-points in the patient-nurse interaction as well as the hospital-call light experience, which will be covered in the next section of this document.




User Research

User Research

Exploring Patient-Nurse Interaction

What do patients and nureses dislike about the current system?

Methods

Secondary Research | Structured Stakeholder Interviews | Experience Mapping

To locate painpoints in the current call light and patient-nurse interaction ecosystems, I talked to and researched a variety of stakeholders within the medical field environment.


My structured interviewed included two nurses, a CNA, and one hospital patient. I also had unstructured casual conversations with medical staff.


I browsed Reddit experiences of both nurses and patients regarding patient-nurse interaction and patient hospital experience.

Pain Points

Nurse

Patient

Call Light Ambiguity

(Interviews)

"Call Lights should only be used in urgent situations."


"We had a code blue the other day, and everyone rushed to help, due to this, one patient's call light was on for 15 minutes. I felt really bad. Turns out she just wanted her door closed."

"Call Lights should only be used in urgent situations."


"We had a code blue the other day, and everyone rushed to help, due to this, one patient's call light was on for 15 minutes. I felt really bad. Turns out she just wanted her door closed."

"Call Lights should only be used in urgent situations."


"We had a code blue the other day, and everyone rushed to help, due to this, one patient's call light was on for 15 minutes. I felt really bad. Turns out she just wanted her door closed."

Some call light buttons are not labeled properly (ie: water drop for water).

Some call light buttons are not labeled properly (ie: water drop for water).

Some call light buttons are not labeled properly (ie: water drop for water).

Accidental Presses

(Interviews)

Wasted Time

Wasted Time

Wasted Time

Patients may sit on the remote


Lack of "call light on" signifier

Patients may sit on the remote


Lack of "call light on" signifier

Patients may sit on the remote


Lack of "call light on" signifier

Call Light Abuse

(Interviews, Reddit)

"One patient was hitting their call light every 90-120 seconds on the last four hours of my shift."


"Some patients think the call light button is a toy or for stress relief."

"One patient was hitting their call light every 90-120 seconds on the last four hours of my shift."


"Some patients think the call light button is a toy or for stress relief."

"One patient was hitting their call light every 90-120 seconds on the last four hours of my shift."


"Some patients think the call light button is a toy or for stress relief."

"I don't use the call light because I don't want the nurses to think I am bothering them."


"I use the call light when I am bored and just want to talk to someone."

"I don't use the call light because I don't want the nurses to think I am bothering them."


"I use the call light when I am bored and just want to talk to someone."

"I don't use the call light because I don't want the nurses to think I am bothering them."


"I use the call light when I am bored and just want to talk to someone."

Alarm Fatigue

(Interviews, Reddit)

"Really annoying ding."


"Lots of call lights going off at once."


"You start to become numb to all the alarms."


"I go home with ringing in my head."

"Really annoying ding."


"Lots of call lights going off at once."


"You start to become numb to all the alarms."


"I go home with ringing in my head."

"Really annoying ding."


"Lots of call lights going off at once."


"You start to become numb to all the alarms."


"I go home with ringing in my head."

"Is the nurse going to answer my call?"

"Is the nurse going to answer my call?"

"Is the nurse going to answer my call?"

Interruption Exhaustion

(Interviews, Reddit)

High Number of Calls


Nurses constantly interrupted, leads to exhaustion.


"We don't really update the whiteboard after the first day."

High Number of Calls


Nurses constantly interrupted, leads to exhaustion.


"We don't really update the whiteboard after the first day."

High Number of Calls


Nurses constantly interrupted, leads to exhaustion.


"We don't really update the whiteboard after the first day."

"These nurses are rude."


"I wish the staff would stop bothering me."

"These nurses are rude."


"I wish the staff would stop bothering me."

"These nurses are rude."


"I wish the staff would stop bothering me."

Call Light Location

(Interviews)

"[Call light] Button is hard to reach above the bed when I have to press it [turn it off], I get into the patients way."

"[Call light] Button is hard to reach above the bed when I have to press it [turn it off], I get into the patients way."

"[Call light] Button is hard to reach above the bed when I have to press it [turn it off], I get into the patients way."

Accidental Activation

Accidental Activation

Accidental Activation

The Remote

(Interviews)




*




*




*

"The buttons are hard to read and press."

"The buttons are hard to read and press."

"The buttons are hard to read and press."

Overview of found patient painpoints within the patient-nurse call light interaction.

Use Cases

(Interviews, Reddit)

  • Need Water

  • Want Food/When is food coming?

  • Needs help with TV

  • "I'm in pain"

  • Wants more medication

  • "When is my next medication dose?"

  • Questions about paperwork

  • Questions about hospital record

  • "Am I ready to leave?"

  • "When is therapy?"

  • "What am I doing in Therapy?"

  • "I'm Nauseous."

  • "I need help making a phone call."

  • Needs to go to bathroom

  • "I just wanted to say hi."

  • Pillow Adjustments

Overview of call light use cases presented to my attention.

Highlights

(Interviews)

  • Nurses will answer call lights as they walk by.

  • Priority given to those who have been waiting the longest.

  • "Independent patients are best"- Nurse

  • Nurses get notifications via a Vincero like device, lights above the door, and at the nurses station.

  • The most modern hospitals leverage the Centrella Ecosystem.

  • Patient MyChart access is a desired feature from nurses.

Overview of call light highlights presented to my attention.

Patient Satisfaction

Why is Patient Satisfaction Important?

Methods

Secondary Research

Hospitals are required to participate in a publicly recorded survey that measures various standards of patient satisfaction. These surveys are handed out to a random number of patients at every U.S. hospital consisting of 29 questions. These surveys measure the communications with nurses/doctors, responsiveness of staff, cleanliness/quietness, medicine communication, discharge info, and overall hospital rating. They must also state whether they recommend a hospital.


Three Goals:


  1. Produce data about patients' perspectives of care that allow objective and meaningful comparisons of hospitals on topics that are important to consumers.


  2. Public reporting of the survey results create new incentives for hospitals to improve quality of care.


  3. Public Reporting serves to enhance accountability in healthcare by increasing transparency of the quality of hospital care provided in return for pubic investment.

User Research Result

I talked to hospital stakeholders (nurses, patients, staff) throughout the entire duration of this project. Some of these conversations were structured as more professional interviews, while others were unstructured casual conversations. 


I categorized the data I received from these stakeholders into 7 categorized painpoints, highlights, and justifications as to why people leverage the call light. I located a survey pointed out to me by one of my stakeholders which encourages hospitals to bring a good experience to their patients.


This data assisted me in moving forward in my problem space. It enabled me to begin crafting an experience map and user flow of painpoints, highlights, and experiences which will be covered next. It also uncovered potential value to improve the patient experience.






Sythesization

Sythesization

Mapping the Data

What needs to be improved within the current hospital call light enviroment?

Methods

User Flow Creation | Affinity Diagram | Experience Map Matrix

After locating stakeholder pain-points and researching the current environment, I needed to begin a deeper analysis. To achieve this, I mapped out a user flow (figure 5) to guide my creation of an experience map matrix diagram. I did this to locate the best opportunities for possible improvement.

User Flow of Stakeholder Painpoints


Before I began crafting an experience map matrix, I wanted to create a flow mapping out how my stakeholders interact with the call light environment, leveraging all the data I have collected to this point. I then used this flow to create my experience map matrix to identify design opportunities.

User Flow overview of potential call light scenarios with identified user painpoints highlighted.

Potential Design Opportunities


I created an experience map to uncover all the opportunities that I can design for using the data I have collected. Below are all the found opportunities I identified from my experience map.


  • How might we make the call light easier to reach?

  • How might we make the call light easier to reach?

  • How might we make the call light easier to find?

  • How might we make the call light easier to find?

  • How might we make patients more independent?

  • How might we make patients more independent?

  • How might we signify the call light button has been activated?

  • How might we signify the call light button has been activated?

  • How might we prevent call light exhaustion?

  • How might we prevent call light exhaustion?

  • How might we provide call light request hierarchy?

  • How might we provide call light request hierarchy?

  • How can we let the patient know they have been heard?

  • How can we let the patient know they have been heard?

  • How might we create a "do not disturb mode" for patients?

  • How might we create a "do not disturb mode" for patients?

  • How might we make the call light more accessible?

  • How might we make the call light more accessible?

  • How might we better communicate patient requests to nurses?

  • How might we better communicate patient requests to nurses?

  • How might we make the call light deactivation easier?

  • How might we make the call light deactivation easier?

  • How might we entertain the patients?

  • How might we entertain the patients?

  • How might we make the buttons easier to press?

  • How might we make the buttons easier to press?

  • How might we better alert nurses?

  • How might we better alert nurses?

  • How might we ease patient anxiety?

  • How might we ease patient anxiety?

  • How might we better communicate call light affordances/use cases?

  • How might we better communicate call light affordances/use cases?

  • How might we give patients access to MyChart?

  • How might we give patients access to MyChart?

  • How might we limit staff interruption exhaustion?

  • How might we limit staff interruption exhaustion?

  • How might we automate some staff tasks?

  • How might we automate some staff tasks?

  • How might we entertain patients?

  • How might we entertain patients?

Narrowing my Scope

I learned that the call light may not be the actual problem leading to upset stakeholders. I uncovered that solely improving a patient's hospital experience may work better toward creating a better nurse-patient interaction environment. I decided to narrow my scope to "Improving the Patient Hospital Experience." I did this to focus on one user, the patient, and to assist hospital patient survey results. Many of my found design opportunities also involved the patient over the staff. Next I began designing for this goal.






Wireframing

Wireframing

Improving the Patient Experience

How can we improve the Patient Hospital Experience?

Methods

Lofi Concept

For my design, I decided to work within one of the two existing ecosystems that I located during this project. I did this to keep my result feasible and to ensure easy implementation. I decided to work off of the Hilrom Centrella Ecosystem.


While researching the Hilrom Centrella Ecosystem, I encountered a device called the Experience Pod. This pod was an exisiting example of an attempt to improve the patient hospital experience. The main concern with this existing device was its lack of functionality. It did not do much for the patient, only holding the patients device and making the bed remote easy to access.


I expanded upon the Hilrom Centrella Experience Pod device via a low fidelity mockup to communicate and test my concept to my stakeholders.

Figure 6 - Experience Pod Plus - Lofi of Patient Overview

The updated Experience Pod Plus will have both a digital and physcial interface for the user to interact with. The first interface shown (figure 6) is the home page for the device. The home page or overview page is used to communicate to the patient their current state during a hospital stay at a glance.


This page is used to replace the whiteboard in current hosptial patient rooms with a digital system. It provides the patient with information to increase independence and decrease calling the nurse for such information.

Figure 7 - Experience Pod Plus - Lofi ofMyChart Access *MyChart page never designed out, features placeholder image that I do not own*

The second page on this new Experience Pod Plus Device gives the hospital patient access to MyChart (figure 7). MyChart is a hospital patient portal displaying medical records and information to a patient.


This page was added per the request of a nurse that I spoke to. She mentioned how her hospital used to give patients a tablet to get access to MyChart, but the hospital halted this feature for the patients. She was unsure why the hospital decided to halt this feature, but wished for it to be brought back to the patients.

Figure 8 - Experience Pod Plus - Lofi of Patient Entertainment

The third page on the new Experience Pod Plus was the entertainment page. On this page the patient can select from a library containing an assortment of movies, games, and books to keep the patient entertained during their hospital stay. This feature would work similar to how airlines give passengers access to a similar feature.


While visiting a hopsital patient for one of my interviews, the patient explained to me how bored they were. They explained that not much was on TV, and that she would "love to watch a movie." Nurses also informed me that bored patients can cause trouble to the staff. These concerns influenced this page.

Figure 9 - Experience Pod Plus - Lofi of Enhanced Call Light Feature

The updated Experience Pod Plus will have an enhanced call light feature. This feature would give the hospital the ability to rotate and customize call light options to cater towards a specific patient. For example, if the patient has a catheter in, they will have a call light specific to the catheter. Upon activation of the call light a audio signifier would alert the patient that the call light has been activated and the interface would be surrounded by a gradient shown in figure 9.


This page is used to communicate to better communicate patient needs to hosptal staff.

Testing

Testing

Testing the Concept

Is this concept feasible for hospitals?

Methods

Unscripted Concept Testing

Due to several constraints within this project I was unable to do formal concept testing with my design. Instead, I showed this concept to several hospital staff and regular people. I asked the hospital staff if they would appreciate patients having a device like this, if there was any information the patient should not have access to, and if this device was logistically feasible.


I also talked to regular people to see if they would appreciate a device like this if they were in a hospital. I categorized this user group as patients for the results of this test.


I divided the information brought to me in several categories:

Overview Page:

Pros:

  • Both groups appreciate info displayed on this page.

  • According to nurses, it is ok for the patients to have easy access to this info.

  • Both groups feel this would improve quality of life during a patient stay.


Cons:

  • Nurses wonder who would keep the info up to date on this page.


MyChart:

Pros:

  • Patients appreciated this page.


Cons:

  • Nurses explained that the patient may see test results before staff have explained the results, which will prompt them to call for assistance before the staff are ready to communicate the test results.


Entertainment:

Pros:

  • Highly valued by both groups as current cable TV is outdated.


Cons:

  • N/A


Call Light:

Pros:

  • Staff appreciate the customizability


Cons:

  • May be harder for patients to access as it is on its own separate page

  • Who will cycle in new buttons for the patient?

  • How will this effect the current call light environment within Hilrom Centrella?

  • How will the different needs be communicated to staff?

The Final Design

The Final Design

I turned my wireframes into a higher fidelity iteration to better communicate my ideas to stakeholders, and to enable my designs to be properly tested in the future.

The Experience Pod (current)

Figure 10 - Hilrom Centrella Experience Pod

The Experience Pod Plus (new)

Figure 11 - Hilrom Centrella Experience Pod Plus

The new Hilrom Centrella Experience Pod will use a similar design to the original, leveraging the flip mechanism to reveal the TV remote. The main difference with the Experience Pod Plus is the addition of a digital interface on the pod. The new pod is outfitted with audio speakers and microphone for communication with staff.


There is also a new "do not disturb" button located on the pod. This button will illuminate the dome light above the patients door to "purple" which signifies to passing staff to shut the patients door, and only bother the patient if needed.


All buttons on the Experience Pod Plus are tactile and easier to press, excluding the digital interface.

Hover for quotes

Patient Quote

Staff Quote

Status "homepage" HiFi

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we make patients more independent?


  • How might we prevent call light exhaustion?

    Call light activation requests:

    • "When is my next therapy session?"

    • "What time is my therapy?"

    • "Am I ready to leave?"

    • "When is my next pain med dose?"


  • How might we ease patient anxiety?

    • "I get anxious of my health state."


  • How might we limit staff interruption exhaustion?

    Update Patient Pain Levels

    Out of date Medical Board

Old vs New Flow


Patient Needs Info -> Reads Whiteboard (hasn't been updated)

Patient Needs Info -> Activates Call Light and Waits


Patient Needs Info -> Looks at Experience Pod Plus

Notifications HiFi

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we ease patient anxiety?

    • "Is a nurse coming?"


  • How might we ensure the patient that they have been heard?

Old vs New Flow


Patient wonders if nurse is coming -> Is unsure



Patient Wonders if Nurse is coming -> Checks notifications

Pain Level Update HiFi

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we increase Patient Independence


  • How might we automate some staff tasks?


Old vs New Flow


Nurse must assess Patient pain levels -> Visits Patient



Nurse must assess Patient pain levels -> Reads Experience Pod Plus

Entertainment HiFi

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we entertain patients?

    "I would love to watch a movie."

    "I feel like I am in jail."

    "I like to keep the door open to watch people walk by."

    "Patients seem to abuse the call light when they are bored."

Old vs New Flow


Patient is bored -> Watches cable TV

Patient is bored -> Looks out window/door

Patient is bored -> Bothers staff


Patient is bored -> Accesses a variety of modern entertainment options

Call Light Options HiFi

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we make the call light more accessible?

    Currently within the Hilrom Centrella Experience, patients must talk to the staff via the staff console to explain call light requests. What if the patient can not talk?


    Requests communicated to staff via text to speech through staff console.


Old vs New Flow


Patient needs staff -> Patient can not talk to staff -> Patient needs unmet


Patient needs staff -> Patient can not talk to staff -> Enters input on Experience Pod Plus

Bonus Features

Features Requested by Staff during Concept Testing

Meal Order HiFi

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we increase Patient Independence


  • How might we automate some staff tasks?


Old vs New Flow


Nurse must gather meal order -> Visits Patient -> Collects meal order -> Looses meal order -> Revisits patient


Nurse must gather meal order -> Sends message to Experience Pod Plus

Doctor Video Call

Opportunities Addressed


  • How might we automate some staff tasks?


Old vs New Flow


Doctor Wants a meeting with patient -> Visits Patient

Doctor Wants a meeting with patient -> Staff brings patient IPad


Doctor Wants a meeting with patient -> Calls patient via the Experience Pod Plus

The Value

Hypothesized Value *untested*

Why would hospitals want to invest in this device?

  • Decreases call light activation, giving more time to nurses and other hospital staff

    • By giving access to information that the patient would previously need staff for


  • Increases Hospital Patient Independence

    • By giving the patient up to date information regarding their hospital status


  • Increases Patient Hospital Stay Satisfaction to boost NHCS survey results, granting public funding

    • Patient satisfaction is increased by the access to modern entertainment, reduced patient boredom

    • Information regarding their hospital stay to increase transparency


  • Increased Hospital Staff Communication

    • Staff can see care team of a patient via the device

    • Staff can monitor a patients pain levels and recovery over a wider range of time


  • Enhanced Accessibility

    • "Write in" option for call light

Limitations & Reflection

Limitations & Reflection

Limitations & Reflection

Limitations


  • Insufficient access to hospital space, leading to assumptions regarding the users and space that can not be tested

  • Large design space with lots of data. Limited time and resources (team of one).

  • Hospitals use a variety of technologies from various ecosystems, for this project I had to assume that a hospital used the Centrella Ecosystem in its desired use case.

  • Giving users more information access can be hypothesized to increase call light activation.


  • This project is not fully completed, more logistical aspects must be thought about in order to make this product feasible. A second software must be designed in order for staff to manage the Experience Pod Plus systems.

  • If more time was given for this project, I would create a scenario based wizard of oz testing to assess if this product improves my found design opportunities.

Reflection


I dove into this user-centered project with a more direct approach, meaning that I would try to solve a direct problem: Redesign the call light environment to improve the experience for both patients and nurses. I quickly learned that this is a very heavy task to complete as a team of one during a one semester college class. I was unfamiliar with my problem space at the start of this project, leading to the project being very broad as I had a lot to learn.


I learned that the call light may not be the actual problem leading to upset stakeholders. I uncovered that solely improving a patient's hospital experience may work better toward creating a better nurse-patient interaction environment. This enabled me to practice a change in scope and challenging assumptions. Being a team of one attempting to tackle such a broad problem, I learned more in this project than any of my previous projects.


If I could talk to myself at the begining of this project, I would have said to be prepared to think holistically in the hospital environment and not stress about creating something that will improve the experience for everyone.